Razer Blade14

Razer puts the Blade 15’s power in a smaller package

From the outside, the Razer Blade 14 looks like every other Razer Blade laptop that we’ve seen in the past few years. It’s got the all-aluminum chassis, the RGB keyboard, the three-headed snake logo, and the subtle black vibe.

But this Razer Blade is very different. It’s the first Blade ever to be powered by an AMD processor. That chip — the Ryzen 9 5900HX — has enabled Razer to put out the most powerful 14-inch gaming laptop ever made.

That’s not just due to the CPU’s raw power. The efficiency of AMD’s product has given Razer the headroom to include Nvidia’s top-of-the-line RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 mobile graphics cards. This is the first 14-inch laptop with those chips. Asus’ Zephyrus G14, which has topped all kinds of best gaming laptop lists for the past year, maxes out at an RTX 3060.

Of course, whether this laptop is a remarkable achievement for Razer is a different question from whether you should actually buy it. The Blade 14 isn’t a cheap system — our test unit costs $2,199.99 — and many folks may justifiably want a bigger screen for that price. But if portability is your priority, this laptop should be on your list. It’s got a mix of performance, specs, and build quality that you won’t find anywhere else.

The system I reviewed comes with a 100W RTX 3070, in addition to 16GB of RAM (which is not upgradable), 1TB of SSD storage (expandable up to 2TB), and a 165Hz QHD display. That same price can also get you a Blade 15 Base with similar GPU and RAM, but with a six-core Intel Core i7 processor and 512GB of storage. The Blade 14 is also thinner and over half a pound lighter: the Blade 15 Base is 4.6 pounds and 0.78 inches thick, while the 14 is 3.92 pounds and 0.66 inches thick.

But the Blade 14 is still expensive as ultraportable gaming laptops go — you’re paying a $500 premium over the FHD 120Hz Razer Blade Stealth 13 (which has a much weaker GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU and a lower refresh rate screen) and $200 more than the top Zephyrus G14 (which has an RTX 3060, but also 32GB of RAM and a fancy dot matrix on its lid).

Elsewhere, you can get a $1,799.99 Blade 14 with a 144Hz FHD screen and an RTX 3060, and $2,799.99 can get you an RTX 3080 with the QHD display. (There’s no touchscreen option.) We haven’t seen an earth-shattering performance difference between RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 systems — 3070s can even outperform 3080s, depending on wattage and clock speeds — so it’s hard to imagine an RTX 3080 Blade 14 really being worth $600 more. (You could literally buy two Zephyrus G14s for that price.)

It seems like Razer has priced this RTX 3070 unit correctly, because the performance I saw was very, very comparable to what we saw from the Blade 15 Base with an RTX 3070. That means it’s blowing smaller laptops, like the Stealth 13 and the Zephyrus G14, out of the water.

RAZER BLADE 14 SPECS (AS TESTED)

  • AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (3.30GHz, eight cores)
  • 16GB DDR4-3200MHz memory (on board)
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 GPU (8GB VRAM, 100W TGP)
  • 1TB SSD (M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4)
  • QHD (2560 x 1440) display, 165Hz
  • 12.59 x 8.66 x 0.66 inches (319.7 x 220 x 16.8 mm)
  • 3.92 pounds (1.78 kg)
  • 61.6Wh lithium-ion polymer battery
  • 230W charger
  • Two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C with power delivery and Display Port 1.4, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, one HDMI 2.1
  • Wi-Fi 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2

Red Dead Redemption running on its Ultra preset averaged 58fps — just one frame away from the Blade 15 Base. (All games were run at native resolution.) The game averaged 51fps with every slider manually maxed out, which is still decently playable. Horizon Zero Dawn ran at 70fps, also just one frame worse than the Blade 15 Base. The Blade 14 actually beat the Blade 15 on Shadow of the Tomb Raider where it averaged 51fps with ray tracing on ultra (the Blade 15 averaged 46fps) and 81fps with ray tracing off.

These numbers make a fairly compelling case for buying the AMD-powered Blade 14 over the Intel-powered Blade 15 Base. The Blade 14 gives you almost identical gaming performance but double the storage at no extra cost. It’s also significantly thinner and lighter, and its eight-core processor will give you an advantage over the Blade 15’s six-core processor in heavy multicore tasks. You’ll want the Blade 15 if you need a bigger screen, of course, but I don’t see many other arguments in its favor at this point.

Just for comparison’s sake, the Blade Stealth 13 only averaged 45fps on Shadow of the Tomb Raider with ray tracing off, which is a very noticeable difference. The Zephyrus G14 with an RTX 2060 put up 74fps on Tomb Raider sans ray tracing, and 31fps on Red Dead. Note that both of these laptops were running the games in FHD, so that performance gap is bigger than the numbers make it seem.

Where the Blade 14 did fall behind was in our export test. It took seven minutes and six seconds to export a five-minute, 33-second 4K video in Adobe Premiere Pro. That’s slower than the Blade 15 Base took, and over a minute slower than the Stealth 13. AMD systems tend to lag behind Intel ones on this task — Intel’s Quick Sync feature is likely a factor. But the Blade 14 did handily beat its two siblings on the PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmark, which measures performance on a variety of Premiere Pro tasks.

via theverge

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post